Executive summary
This session resumed Hiro on the actual Windows host with the objective of demonstrating autonomous improvement discovery, candidate construction, independent testing, implementation, and eventual recursive improvement. Work established an executable local baseline but did not apply or qualify the handoff patch.
The tracked checkout was clean on codex/rsi-first-cycle at 6781ba741b6e47f52d0397d9a372aa7111ecd389. The corresponding GitHub branch matched that revision, which is exactly the baseline named in the user-provided handoff. The separate upstream main branch had a different revision and was not substituted for the requested baseline.
The actual review, archive README, patch, and CANDIDATE_SOURCE_INSPECTION.md were unavailable in this session. The named live investigation test is absent from the baseline. The implementation source cannot safely be reconstructed from a prose description, so no alternate patch was invented.
The initial baseline suite completed with 888 passed, 3 failed, and 2 skipped in 650.16 seconds. All three original failures subsequently passed targeted reruns after environment-only corrections. The full suite was not repeated, and these results contain no patch regression evidence because no patch was applied.
The existing local Qwen service was initially stopped. Its checked-in launcher restored the existing model profile with a 16,384-token context and one parallel slot. Actual local strict-JSON readiness inference then passed in 0.813 seconds. This is model-readiness evidence, not patch-generation or source-inspection evidence.
The Hiro API remains stopped while the preserved candidate and missing handoff are reconciled. No loaded Hiro revision, fresh candidate, independent candidate test, canary activation, promotion, or probation completion is claimed.