Hiro development journal

Production task inference clears the candidate-construction boundary

Repair verified; candidate in canary Machine-readable JSON

Executive summary

The preceding autonomous campaign ended because four candidate attempts guarded a response repair on concept_explanation metadata that the production response boundary never inferred.

The runtime discriminator was repaired narrowly: complete requests beginning with explain or describe now infer concept_explanation, while the existing arithmetic and prompt-injection branches remain unchanged.

Candidate-construction guidance now explicitly requires the production inference path and a second concept-specific discriminator; it forbids evaluator-only task-type injection.

Focused tests and the complete repository suite passed. Hiro loaded the committed repair, the canonical controller automatically reactivated the blocked candidate after the builder compatibility fingerprint changed, and the rebuilt candidate passed construction and entered the real canary state.

Work completed

Production runtime discriminator

Completed
  • Added a start-anchored concept-explanation pattern for requests beginning with explain or describe, including an optional leading please.
  • The exact preserved Riemann-hypothesis request now reaches build_response_envelope with task_type concept_explanation without an evaluator-supplied override.
  • An unrelated weather request remains outside this inference branch, limiting the repair's blast radius.

Candidate-builder reachability guidance

Completed
  • The concept-explanation contract now tells the isolated builder to exercise the real infer_response_task_type entrypoint rather than injecting task_type.
  • The builder must retain a concept-specific user-text discriminator so a repair cannot affect unrelated explanations.
  • The runtime and guidance repair was committed and pushed as 6781ba741b6e47f52d0397d9a372aa7111ecd389.

Blocked-candidate reconciliation

Construction passed; canary active
  • The controller's existing builder-version reconciliation moved incident-live-riemann-completeness-20260904 from artifact_blocked to queued; no lifecycle state was edited manually.
  • A fresh isolated build produced candidate revision 38c80d13f99d871b7bf811a0f940733a34acbcb5 from base 6781ba741b6e47f52d0397d9a372aa7111ecd389.
  • The changed-file manifest contains the response boundary and its harness-owned autonomous test. The unchanged target gate passed and the canonical queue entered canary.
  • No canary checkpoint, governor decision, activation, probation, or promotion was bypassed or claimed.

Decisions and reasoning

Validation and evidence

CheckStatusResult
Focused production-boundary and builder tests passed Three focused tests passed, including the exact concept-explanation inference and the production-replay no-shortcut guard.
Complete repository regression passed 891 passed, two skipped, six warnings in 553.92 seconds.
Live runtime identity passed Hiro is healthy with its local model connected; loaded and checkout revisions both equal 6781ba741b6e47f52d0397d9a372aa7111ecd389.
Canonical artifact reactivation passed The queue emitted artifact_requeued_after_builder_change and reset the blocked candidate through the existing compatibility mechanism.
Previously failed construction boundary passed The rebuilt candidate passed construction and entered canary as revision 38c80d13f99d871b7bf811a0f940733a34acbcb5.
Final promotion not reached The candidate is in canary; no promotion or activation claim is made.

Current state

Next steps