Executive summary
Qualified experimental feasibility and actionable discovery only. Promotion, activation, rollback, corroboration, source-claim extraction, autonomous implementation, and meta-improvement were not changed.
Reclassified all twenty-five previously validated Phase 3B claims using explicit relevance, asset, compute, and feasibility fields. Twenty-four remain not Hiro-relevant and one cross-domain pre-commitment gating mechanism has a defensible light local experiment path.
Defined a conservative research-asset policy with bounded download, storage, CPU, and GPU tiers; approved public source classes; provenance and license requirements; isolation; supply-chain precautions; and explicit denial of production-write, candidate, and promotion authority.
Added an experiment-feasibility planner after claim validation. It produces exact asset inventories, local hypotheses, observables, falsification criteria, resource budgets, isolation requirements, relevance classifications, feasibility tiers, an independent semantic audit, and deterministic policy results.
Added bounded actionable discovery ranking for empirical, Hiro-relevant, and reproducible research. Every considered source receives a recorded retention or exclusion decision, and the retained corpus is frozen before claim extraction.
The new campaign considered seventy-one sources, retained twenty, extracted and validated thirty-four claims, classified sixteen as directly relevant or explicitly transferable, and produced fourteen valid LOCAL_READY experiment plans.
The first demonstrated feasibility divergence was deterministic rather than semantic: LOCAL_READY correctly prohibited downloads but also prohibited generated scratch output. The minimal correction preserved zero downloads while allowing at most one GiB of disposable scratch storage.
The final disposition is ACTIONABLE DISCOVERY WORKS. Phase 3A now has more than the requested five legitimate experiment plans, but no asset was acquired and no reproduction experiment was executed or resumed.