{ "schemaVersion": 2, "date": "2026.08.16", "publishedAt": "2026-08-16T12:14:23-07:00", "timeZone": "America/Los_Angeles", "title": "First governed agenda cycle with Qwen 3.8", "publicationStatus": "Implementation and bounded live cycle completed without promotion", "executiveSummary": [ "Hiro's rank-one open-problem challenge is now connected to the existing autonomous candidate pipeline through a durable single-item queue. The bridge freezes an ImprovementSpec, constructs at most one patch in an external worktree, runs the existing public, held-out, regression, latency, and invariant gates, and stops before integration.", "Qwen 3.8 27B was loaded locally and used for the first bounded cycle. Four candidate-construction runs exercised the system: the harness discovered and repaired an inconclusive baseline, missing repair feedback, a weak status-trusting solution, and an evaluator-attribution problem. No candidate was promoted, integrated, or applied to Hiro's active branch.", "The strongest candidate passed its targeted tests and one replicated global evaluation, but the same public epistemics-category regression appeared in its original evaluation and a second replication. A predeclared two-clean-replication rule therefore stopped it before the independent adversarial challenge. The result is negative but useful evidence: uncertainty failed closed and the next research target is evaluator variance and causal attribution." ], "workstreams": [ { "title": "Governed agenda execution queue", "status": "Completed", "details": [ "Added a versioned execution policy for the rank-one evaluator-validity challenge. It authorizes bounded sandbox candidate construction while explicitly denying active-branch mutation, promotion, and automatic Stage 5 integration.", "Added a SQLite-backed queue and append-only event history linking the agenda item, parent open problem, frozen specification, experiment record, candidate packet, sandbox result, replication result, and independent challenge state.", "Added admit, run, retry, replicate, challenge, and status commands. Only one agenda item and one newly constructed candidate can be active per tick.", "Exposed queue state through the Evaluation Observatory API and added execution-queue visibility to the benchmark page." ] }, { "title": "Executable evaluator challenge and repair loop", "status": "Completed", "details": [ "Added a stable fail-closed evaluator-diagnostics baseline so a candidate's targeted tests can run against both baseline and candidate rather than failing during baseline import collection.", "Preserved failed validation commands in candidate-repair prompts. Before this correction, a trailing-whitespace failure was omitted because only the final successful commands reached the next repair attempt.", "Added a protected independent challenge with four public and six held-out controls. It tests whether a classifier derives support from evidence instead of trusting a caller-declared success status.", "When the first independently challenged candidate falsely accepted all five invalid held-out improvement claims, the queue recorded the result and generated a revision-two specification containing aggregate failure feedback without disclosing held-out examples." ] }, { "title": "Replication and causal-attribution safeguard", "status": "Completed", "details": [ "Added a two-clean-replication rule for a frozen candidate rejected by a potentially noisy global category score. Replications reuse the immutable candidate packet, original pinned baseline, public suite, external held-out suite, policy, and regression tests.", "The rule does not weaken any individual promotion gate. Both additional evaluations must independently be eligible before the candidate may advance to the protected challenge.", "Removed an unintended unique index that silently deduplicated identical repeated lifecycle events. Retries and replications are now preserved as distinct audit events even when their payloads match.", "The live candidate achieved one clean replication and one rejected replication; the latter repeated the 0.0833 public epistemics-category regression. The queue ended in replication_failed." ] }, { "title": "Qwen 3.8 live execution", "status": "Completed", "details": [ "Loaded the pinned local Qwen3.8-27B Q4_K_M artifact through the checked-in Windows launcher with an 8192-token context, one parallel inference slot, and GPU offload configured by the launcher.", "Verified the OpenAI-compatible model endpoint reports qwen/qwen3.8-27b. The model remained loaded after the bounded cycle for subsequent work.", "Existing Daylab workers also used the single inference slot, increasing wall-clock latency. They were left untouched because they were outside this session's scope." ] } ], "decisions": [ "Reuse Hiro's existing Stage 2 through Stage 4 evidence pipeline instead of creating a parallel promotion mechanism.", "Treat a sandbox pass only as permission to run an independent challenge, never as promotion evidence by itself.", "Keep automatic Stage 5 integration disabled for agenda work even when the general sandbox configuration permits it elsewhere.", "Make the evaluator-diagnostics baseline executable and deliberately fail closed so targeted baseline contrast can distinguish a real behavioral improvement.", "Feed independent-challenge failures back as aggregate requirements while keeping held-out controls hidden from candidate construction.", "Require two clean repetitions of the exact same frozen candidate before attributing an isolated global category regression to noise.", "Stop the latest candidate after one of two repetitions failed; do not override the gate based on the implementation's apparent lack of connection to the regressed category." ], "validation": [ { "check": "Focused execution, candidate-repair, evaluator-baseline, protected-challenge, registry, agenda, and dashboard tests", "status": "passed", "result": "Multiple focused runs passed as the bridge evolved, including final focused coverage of 23 tests after the replication and event-history safeguards were added." }, { "check": "Full Hiro regression suite", "status": "passed", "result": "625 tests passed in 149.20 seconds after all implementation changes and the live cycle completed." }, { "check": "Live candidate one: baseline contrast", "status": "rejected safely", "result": "The candidate and regressions passed, but baseline targeted-test collection failed because the new module did not exist on baseline. The result was classified as inconclusive rather than eligible." }, { "check": "Live candidate two: construction repair", "status": "failed safely", "result": "All three attempts stopped on trailing whitespace. This revealed that failed command output was absent from repair context; the builder was corrected and tested." }, { "check": "Live candidate three: independent adversarial challenge", "status": "failed safely", "result": "Sandbox evaluation was eligible, but held-out challenge accuracy was 16.7% with five invalid-claim false accepts. No integration occurred; aggregate feedback was added to specification revision two." }, { "check": "Live candidate four: frozen-candidate replication", "status": "failed safely", "result": "Targeted and regression tests passed. The original evaluation and replication two each showed a 0.0833 public epistemics-category regression; replication one was clean. With only one of two required clean replications, the candidate did not reach independent challenge." }, { "check": "Journal test and production build", "status": "passed", "result": "npm run test:hiro passed. npm run build generated and validated 136 journal entries, then TypeScript and Vite completed the production build successfully." } ], "currentState": [ "The agenda execution queue is in replication_failed for agenda-ea40537726b48b6e3e7f. Its latest frozen candidate remains external to Hiro's active branch.", "No candidate was promoted or integrated, Stage 5 remained disabled, and no live Hiro restart was performed.", "Qwen 3.8 27B remains loaded locally and available at the existing OpenAI-compatible endpoint.", "The active implementation branch contains six session commits covering the queue, executable baseline, repair feedback, protected challenge, feedback revision, and replication safeguard." ], "limitations": [ "The global public and held-out suites are small enough that a single case can move a category score materially. Repeated model sampling can therefore dominate evaluation of a narrow deterministic utility change.", "Two clean replications are a conservative stopping rule, not a calibrated statistical model of evaluator variance. Baseline and candidate repetition design still needs explicit power and variance analysis.", "The latest candidate uses one evidence vocabulary, while the protected challenge intentionally uses alternate field forms and conflicting controls. Because replication failed first, its protected generalization was not evaluated.", "The queue currently records bounded result summaries but does not yet offer a dashboard drill-down for every external packet and per-case score.", "The execution policy currently enables only the rank-one challenge. Later agenda problems remain planning records until their task contracts and protected evaluations are implemented.", "Model-server contention from unrelated local workers increased run time and may contribute to latency variance, although it did not change the safety decision." ], "nextSteps": [ "Add repeated unchanged-baseline and unchanged-candidate sampling to estimate per-case and per-category variance before comparing narrow patches.", "Separate deterministic targeted behavioral proof from stochastic global agent non-regression, then define a calibrated sequential decision rule without weakening invariant or held-out gates.", "Add causal attribution metadata showing whether changed files can reach each evaluation entrypoint; use it as diagnostic evidence, not as an automatic gate override.", "Improve protected challenge feedback taxonomy so future repairs receive field-schema and conflict-handling categories without seeing held-out cases.", "Add dashboard links to sandbox, replication, and independent-challenge packets and show the full append-only attempt timeline.", "After evaluator variance is calibrated, schedule a fresh revision-three candidate rather than retrying or promoting the stopped candidate." ] }