Executive summary
A live conversation exposed three failures that were recorded by parts of Hiro's telemetry but did not become actionable continuous-improvement queue incidents.
The response-quality ledger contains the affected server responses, and the incident harvester advanced its watermark past them, but each row remained marked as not requiring repair.
The queue therefore correctly reports zero actionable incidents under its present rules, even though the user experienced an unnecessary evidence refusal, a client timeout, and an unusable directions response.
The diagnosis identifies a missing bridge between final-validator outcomes, client-visible failures, conversational follow-ups, and automatic incident intake. No Hiro code or runtime configuration was changed in this diagnostic session.